• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Primary Cementing
  • Remedial Cementing
  • Plug Cementing
  • Job Execution
  • Post-job results interpretation
  • Equipment
  • Laboratory
  • Mission
  • About
  • Contact and Questions?
  • My Cementing Challenges

Better Well Cementing for ALL

The Leading Online Support Hub for Better Oil Well Cementing.

Excellent cement job, but with terrible results … how is this possible?

September 6, 2020 By Lenin Diaz 4 Comments

Excellent cement job, but with terrible results … how is this possible?




We all want to achieve an excellent cement job every time, we pride ourselves in achieving this. can face a common challenge while attempting zonal isolation during primary cementing: the resulting lack of “good bond” – as measured with cement logs – across permeable zones. This is typically seen as a sudden decrease in cement presence (an increase in CBL amplitude or decrease in Attenuation in sonic logs or a clearer image, maybe some green or even red, in ultrasonic logs) overlapping with lower gamma-ray readings or micro-fracture formations.

The problem becomes more significant and challenging to address when coinciding with a depleted formation or sub-normal formation pressure. This degree of depletion will be leading to the higher differential pressure between the cement slurry and the pore pressure, as can be seen in the chart below.

From a well cementing point of view, the combined effect of higher differential pressure and permeability will cause additional fluid loss from the cement slurry (cement filtrate) into the porous media compared to other formations above and below.

This additional amount of cement filtrate (fluid leaving the cement slurry’s constituents) to the formation creates a reduction in volume (cement available to fill the annular space), eventually leading to less cement once set due to bulk shrinkage. In other words, the cement becomes denser (density = mass/volume) or the same solids with the less liquid phase, reducing the volume each “mass” of set cement occupies.

This process will occur locally and predominantly in front of the permeable zone, and the longer/thicker the permeable zone interval, the more damaging the effect.

Diagram showing why an excellent cement job on paper might fail in use



This volume reduction in the cement can induce radial cracks forming once the cement is set. In simpler terms, as there is insufficient cement to fill the annular space, the cement sets in tension being “pull” circumferentially, leading to cracks parallel to the casing extending from the casing to the formation across the cement.

In logs, this can be seen similar to the lack of or poor casing-cement bonding or micro-annulus signature (high amplitude in CBL vs clear formation arrivals in VDL). Still, the main difference is the clarity of the formation arrivals in the VDL. In the presence of radial cracks induced by bulk loss of cement filtrate, the images of formation arrivals, if present, will be less noticeable or weaker; this is because of the combined presence of inner (casing-cement) and outer (cement-formation) micro-annulus.

Now, the big questions…

  • Can we still get an excellent cement job?
  • Is this lack of bond remediable?
  • Is squeeze cementing attainable?
  • More profoundly, is zonal isolation in jeopardy?

Most importantly, the answer is YES to the last question; zonal isolation is jeopardized, but this is not easily correctable.

Why? Because every time, during a squeeze cementing operation, the casing, or a portion of it, is pressurized, and any micro annulus will tend to close. That forces the fluid inside out, limiting the space for the further flow of fluids away (both occupying fluids and squeezed cement slurry filtrate).

Factors that can increase the success rate are perforating density and phasing, not shot penetration or diameter. Penetration and shot diameter would increase the injectivity but not favor injection or flow to the affected area in the annular gap.

More importantly, why remediate (perforated casing + squeeze = possible casing leak in the future) if “bulk loss of cement filtrate in from permeable zones” can be prevented? Yes, this situation is preventable, leading to an OK cement log the first and only time. This must be the objective.

Information about the possibility of this problem usually comes from the well design process. The more professional ones incorporate it in the risk register, or well construction (most common drilling) challenges table. The cement engineer should include formal elements to the cement slurry and cement placement process with this information.

The accuracy of the proposed design elements to the job scheme will be determined by “experience.” Either the experience of the engineer or collective expertise in the area.

In other words, previous experience in the form of the engineer’s experience in different locations around the world or joint team experience in the same location because of previous similar failures (the problem has been happening for some time already). 

Did you learn a new barrier to an excellent cement job result? In a later post, we will discuss the slurry and job design to overcome this problem and get the best cement log right from the first time.

Cheers

L. Diaz

Related posts:

  1. Cement Bond Log and Variable Density Results
  2. Workover Cementing Techniques 2: Squeeze Cementing
  3. A talk about API Fluid Loss
  4. Cement, Spacer, all there. But where’s the wiper plug?

Filed Under: Primary Cementing Tagged With: cement evaluation, formation interaction

Article Posted By:

Lenin Diaz is an oil industry specialist with 26 years of technical and operational expertise in fluids, cementing, water control and shut-off. A distinguished track record spanning BP, Schlumberger, and NAPESCO. Lenin lives in Tenerife, Spain and is the creator of this website. Read More…

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jean TENIN says

    October 14, 2020 at 8:19 am

    Hi Lenin,

    In such permeable zone I have had results with API low fluid loss <30ml. it maybe costly for the operator but the chances of success are much greater.
    Else reduce the Slurry TT to the minimum acceptable by Company policy. Why not using expanding agent to overcome the potential micro annulus (can be use only in the slurry to be placed in from of the permeable zone).

    rgds

    Jean

    Reply
    • Lenin Diaz says

      October 18, 2020 at 11:25 am

      Hi Jean, thanks for your comment and interest in well cementing.
      That is correct, a way to mitigate formation interaction is a very low fluid loss and the use of expanding agent; like any mitigation measure, success is not ensured and likely producing a range of results from no effect to an actual improvement in cement bond. Another cheaper way to mitigate this phenomenon is to increase the slurry density, from 15.8 ppg to 16-16.2 ppg for example, keeping a low fluid loss of around 50 ml/30min (easily achievable with dispersant + fluid loss). Ideally, the fluid loss additive quantity should be as low as possible, since now the slurry is water-reduced the amount of dispersant is optimised giving a low fluid loss of filtrate, then the fluid loss additive is added to take it to 50 ml/30min. The benefits are mainly a cheaper slurry with better mechanical properties less susceptible to formation interaction, less radial cracks and increase visibility on a cement bond log overall.
      One of the problems, with very low fluid loss slurries like you mention is the negative effect on compressive strength making the slurry more sensitive to contamination, a negative effect that can hide or overpower any potential benefit from the lower filtrate in terms of cement log visibility.
      Any question please let me know
      Cheers
      L. Diaz

      Reply
  2. Jean TENIN says

    October 14, 2020 at 8:20 am

    Hi Lenin,

    In such permeable zone I have had results with API low fluid loss <30ml. it maybe costly for the operator but the chances of success are much greater.
    Else reduce the Slurry TT to the minimum acceptable by Company policy. Why not using expanding agent to overcome the potential micro annulus (can be use only in the slurry to be placed in from of the permeable zone).

    rgds

    Jean

    Reply
    • Lenin Diaz says

      October 18, 2020 at 11:25 am

      Hi Jean, thanks for your comment and interest in well cementing.
      That is correct, a way to mitigate formation interaction is a very low fluid loss and the use of expanding agent; like any mitigation measure, success is not ensured and likely producing a range of results from no effect to an actual improvement in cement bond. Another cheaper way to mitigate this phenomenon is to increase the slurry density, from 15.8 ppg to 16-16.2 ppg for example, keeping a low fluid loss of around 50 ml/30min (easily achievable with dispersant + fluid loss). Ideally, the fluid loss additive quantity should be as low as possible, since now the slurry is water-reduced the amount of dispersant is optimised giving a low fluid loss of filtrate, then the fluid loss additive is added to take it to 50 ml/30min. The benefits are mainly a cheaper slurry with better mechanical properties less susceptible to formation interaction, less radial cracks and increase visibility on a cement bond log overall.
      One of the problems, with very low fluid loss slurries like you mention is the negative effect on compressive strength making the slurry more sensitive to contamination, a negative effect that can hide or overpower any potential benefit from the lower filtrate in terms of cement log visibility.
      Any question please let me know
      Cheers
      L. Diaz

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Trango DEPM is a team of Oil&Gas professionals with broad experience in the O&G industry. Working on onshore and offshore projects around the world, including most vivid and challenging areas as Saudi Arabia, US Marcellus shale and North Sea, but also small on small projects, requiring individual approach, we are well equipped to help you plan, budget, implement and execute your drilling project successfully. We also cooperate with number of other professionals with experience in such areas as drilling, geology, geophysics, procurement or logistics. This allows us to fully run your project or just support you in desired areas of expertise, depends on you needs.

How I survived the 2016 Downturn and the current difficult times?

Find the content you need

Archives

24 Page Free Primary Cementing Guide

Click this image to take a look. It is comprehensive and easy to follow too!

In 2016, I launched Better Cementing for All. Now, I want to keep it alive.

For more than 26 years, I have worked in oil well cementing, offering my services to some of the largest oil corporations in the world and committing myself to excellence. I have mastered my role, and in doing so, I have accrued a skill set that is extremely valuable to my fellow professionals. Eager to do whatever I can to help them, I have owned and operated Better Cementing for All since 2016.
Let me tell you what Better Cementing for All does and what it means. A resource for all oil industry professionals and for cementers both established and prospective, this is a non-profit resource that I established in order to do nothing but serve and make an impact on people who are looking to build careers for themselves in cementing.
From primary cementing to remedial cementing to plug cementing to post-job results, I do it all, and I am comfortable answering in-depth questions about each and every one of these topics. I also offer tools and tips for jobseekers, general self-development advice, and guidance for equipment choices. TO put it simply, this is the go-to spot for anyone who wants to know anything about oil well cementing.
The problem, however, is that covid-19 has made the structure of the website seem untenable. I am trying to juggle the work that I do and my non-profit initiatives and finding it all unhealthy and unsustainable. I want to keep Better Cementing for All up and running, but to do that, I need your help.


My NEW introductory VIDEO

Recent Posts

Max Out Your Cement Coverage

If we consider the main variables to ensure proper mud in hole replacement with cement: stand-off, … [Read More...] about Max Out Your Cement Coverage

Cementing Flowchart

In recent weeks, I received some reader requests to include cement job processes or procedures as … [Read More...] about Cementing Flowchart

Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones

This article will provide you with some actionable suggestions for cementing across permeable zones. … [Read More...] about Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones

Forensic Cementing

Forensic is a term usually associated with crimes. Criminal forensics is the use of science to … [Read More...] about Forensic Cementing

Cement Slurry design Basics

First, here is a handy table to simplify the process of cement slurry design: Additive … [Read More...] about Cement Slurry design Basics

well cementing pre-job cement challenge question

Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)

Though I am far from being an animation expert, during my training courses I have always wanted to … [Read More...] about Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)

Need urgent help?

WhatsApp me at this number: +34 657 07 01 78

Footer

Recent activity

Visit our latest posts and help others by adding a comment.

Make your contribution and help keep Better Cementing for All alive!

Now more than ever, we are facing a loss of expertise in our industry, and Better Cementing for All is a unifying force, featuring interactions among industry professionals, knowledge sharing through posts, and other valuable pieces of content that we need to preserve.

Recent Comments

  • Merit on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on All you need to know about Bentonite in Cement Slurries
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Suicide Squeeze Cementing: risky but valid
  • Samuel Bekele Bedjiga on All you need to know about Bentonite in Cement Slurries

Recent Posts

  • Max Out Your Cement Coverage
  • Cementing Flowchart
  • Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones
  • Forensic Cementing
  • Cement Slurry design Basics
  • Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)
  • Plug and Abandonment Webinar (Español)
  • Webinar series (II). Quality Assurance in Cementing Operations (Spanish)
  • Webinar series (I). Log interpretation (Spanish)

Submit your email

&middot Better Well Cementing For All is owned by L. Diaz © 2023 &middot TOS & Privacy Policy &middot Web Design &middot