• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Primary Cementing
  • Remedial Cementing
  • Plug Cementing
  • Job Execution
  • Post-job results interpretation
  • Equipment
  • Laboratory
  • Mission
  • About
  • Contact and Questions?
  • My Cementing Challenges

Better Well Cementing for ALL

The Leading Online Support Hub for Better Oil Well Cementing.

Geothermal Well Cementing

June 27, 2016 By Lenin Diaz Torres 10 Comments

Geothermal Well Cementing

A recent request about the topic of geothermal well cementing brought me memories of a project I led back in 2008. It was my first time in a geothermal well construction project. Yes, there was a rig, there was drilling, drilling fluids and cementing but, it was entirely different from the oil and gas business. The most significant difference that made me feel at first out of place was the perception of time. In that project, there was no rush, and the concept of NPT was not that severe.

It took me some time, but then it was good, and we managed to work well with the company in charge. The problematic part, later on, was to return to the dynamics of the oil and gas when the project ended. Nice experience nonetheless.

Below are some things that I learned from this time that apply, to help answer this request.

Cement Slurry considerations:

1. Lightweight because of losses, it is a common issue in igneous rock. Losses are likely difficult to cure due to caves and vugs, and the casing gets cemented to the surface.

2. At about 230F it needs silica to prevent cement retrogression and effect of CO2 (if dissolved in the produced fluids), At about 350 – 400F it is better to use silica flour with an average size of 10-20 micros.

3. We used Ceramic/glass-based products, such as cenospheres or cementitious material such as fly ash can as extenders, stabilizing cement phases at high temperature.

4. Very Low permeability in the cement matrix is a requirement. (< 0.1 mD).

5. The main issue is not temperature but cycling (temperature variations and cycles when the well in energized).

6. Magnesium and Sulfate Attacks kinetics increases = accelerated aging.

Comparison of High Temperature (BHST) applications of cement:

1. Deep well with normal geothermal gradients, HPHT or HTLP. BHST 160 C – 180C/Class G, H with 35 to 40% silica content.

2. Steam injection (Low API oil) to increase production: Temperature during injection is about 315C/Class G, H with 35 to 40% silica content.

3. Geothermal wells temperature as high as 370C/Class G, H with 35 to 40% silica content

4. Combustion in situ or fireflooding as high as 900C (cement can be used up 425C) /CAC or calcium aluminate cement, also known as calcium aluminate cement.

Now, Talking about high BHCT (circulating temperature during cementing)

Only, one and three can have relatively high BHCT when near the reservoir zone, but in geothermal applications, the well is cooled down before cementing. For BHCT above 90 C some API cement tests are not applicable (check slurry stability).

In a geothermal well, typically they would require a 1000 psi CS to be enough and casing are cemented to surface to prevent temperature-induced casing enlargement.

Related posts:

  1. Misconceptions About Cementing
  2. Challenge No. 2: Cement Substitutes?
  3. Cement Challenge 4: Pre-Job Planning
  4. Workover Cementing Techniques 2: Squeeze Cementing

Filed Under: Primary Cementing

Article Posted By:

Lenin Diaz is an oil industry specialist with 26 years of technical and operational expertise in fluids, cementing, water control and shut-off. A distinguished track record spanning BP, Schlumberger, and NAPESCO. Lenin lives in Tenerife, Spain and is the creator of this website. Read More…

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Oleg Sekachev says

    July 6, 2016 at 7:06 am

    The BHST looks doen’t matter either it is 110 or 370 DegC anyway 35-40% of Silica?

    Reply
    • Lenin Diaz says

      July 6, 2016 at 5:12 pm

      Oleg, Thanks for your question
      The reason to add silica is to lower the bulk lime-to-silica ratio (CaO/SiO2 ratio) from around 1.5 to 3 in Cement to at least 1. At 110 oC, a CaO/SiO2 ratio of > 1.5 would allow the formation of a denser phase (α-C2SH) resulting in loss of compressive strength and increased permeability. If the CaO/SiO2 ratio is reduced to around 1, α-C2SH will not form and a phase called Tobermorite will form preventing strength retrogression. If you follow in the diagram attached the phase forming at higher temperature for a CaO/SiO2 of 1, You will see Tobermorite, Xonolite and truscottite. All these are OK to preserve compressive strength up to 400 – 450 oC where complete dehydration will lead to disintegration of the set cement.
      From the explanation above and to answer your question, The % of silica to add does not depend on the temperature, as you can see, so 35 to 40% should be Ok up to 370 oC. However, the percentage of Silica (SiO2) does depend on the cement composition. From your pure Cement QA/QC you will have the % of the cement phases, these are: (CaO)3SiO2, (CaO)2SiO2, (CaO)3Al2O3 and (CaO)4Al2O3Fe2O3. The average % for these varies and the QA/QC sheet from the cement manufacturer will include this information. You can see all 4 contain CaO and only the firsts two have SiO2, so using the % of the phases you should be able to estimate the required % of SiO2 to add (if you need to know how, please send me an email) to lower the CaO/SiO2 ratio to around 1. In some cases up to 60% of silica could be required.
      A couple of final comments:
      1) A higher temperature, above 200 oC, silica flour with smaller particle size of +/- 10 -20 microns is preferred
      2) The problem of strength retrogression is not so much the loss of compressive strength but the increase in permeability (around 40 times more). Why? because it would be easier for formation fluids containing Mg + Na Sulphates and other to enter the cement matrix making the cement even weaker (aging) and lost of zonal isolation.

      If you need further detail please contact me
      Cheers
      L. Diaz

      Reply
      • Oleg Sekachev says

        July 7, 2016 at 5:56 am

        Thanks Lenin for your comments mentioned regarding the % od Silica Flour in cement blend for HPHT to avoid the Strength retrogression and permeability. But in some articles mentioned the % of Silica Flour should be from 210 DegC not less than 60% even 80 or 100%. That’s why I wonder. But you say that the size of Silica should be 10-20 microns or 1250 – 625 mesh. It is almost the Silica Fume and it will make the skurry very viscous. What density did you use for this size of Silica?

        Reply
        • admin says

          July 8, 2016 at 2:30 am

          Hello Oleg, Thanks again for your comments and questions.
          As I mentioned, There is no need to increase the % of silica at higher temperatures. % of silica depends on cement composition (% of cement phases, content of CaO and SiO2) and not on temperature. I have seen as high as 60% of silica, but it wasn’t because of temperature.
          You are correct that this much silica flour (10 – 20 microns) would make the slurry viscous, and that is something to be adjusted at the lab. An alternative, in case of high rheology is to combine silica flour with silica sand (average 100 microns) to reach the required total percentage of silica. Another alternative for geothermal wells is to add glass/ceramic cenosperes (300 microns) which would help with lowering slurry density as well, in case of severe losses very common in geothermal wells.
          In your case, HPHT I would opt for a combination of silica flour or silica sand if BHST > 200 oC, with lowest possible addition of dispersant, sufficient fluid loss additive to stabilize the slurry and the required amount of retarder. The right combination of all these would prevent annoying 3ary and 4ry gelling problems or slurry destabilization at bottom

          Reply
          • Oleg Sekachev says

            July 8, 2016 at 8:18 am

            Thanks again Lenin for your advise. The Silica Flour size 325 mesh is good enough? Or you can use as well 200 mesh? Or combination. As with 325 mesh size of silica you need the antisettling agent to add. The BHST is 250-280 DegC. Or what would you suggest?

          • Lenin Diaz says

            July 9, 2016 at 1:02 am

            Oleg, good questions! Thanks.
            325 and 200 mesh would provide similar performance in terms of preventing cement strength retrogression. At such a high temeperatures 280 oC and deep well, as I belive you mention HPHT, cement slurry stability is always an issue. If you only have 325 and 200 microns, I would choose only 325 mesh to add little help with settling and depending on cement quality the % of silica, as mentioned before.

  2. Ember Duran says

    July 6, 2016 at 3:24 pm

    Good. There is also horizontal well cementing in SAGD (mostly in Canada – heavy oil sand) where cycling is also a big issue. Check out those lessons learned.

    Reply
    • Lenin Diaz says

      July 6, 2016 at 5:16 pm

      Thank you Ember, Yes SAGD and steam injection wells are good reference. In Steam injection and geothermal wells the combination of high temperature and temperature cycles is the main problem.

      Cheers
      L. Diaz

      Reply
  3. Ember Duran says

    July 6, 2016 at 3:26 pm

    Why the monkeys???

    Reply
    • Lenin Diaz says

      July 6, 2016 at 5:45 pm

      It means “see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil” which sometimes is referred to pretending ignorance to what other do wrong, for me it is actually the opposite, it means to provide help to prevent what is or can be worng. If you don’t allow “evil” to enter your life you will have only good actions.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Trango DEPM is a team of Oil&Gas professionals with broad experience in the O&G industry. Working on onshore and offshore projects around the world, including most vivid and challenging areas as Saudi Arabia, US Marcellus shale and North Sea, but also small on small projects, requiring individual approach, we are well equipped to help you plan, budget, implement and execute your drilling project successfully. We also cooperate with number of other professionals with experience in such areas as drilling, geology, geophysics, procurement or logistics. This allows us to fully run your project or just support you in desired areas of expertise, depends on you needs.

How I survived the 2016 Downturn and the current difficult times?

Find the content you need

Archives

24 Page Free Primary Cementing Guide

Click this image to take a look. It is comprehensive and easy to follow too!

In 2016, I launched Better Cementing for All. Now, I want to keep it alive.

For more than 26 years, I have worked in oil well cementing, offering my services to some of the largest oil corporations in the world and committing myself to excellence. I have mastered my role, and in doing so, I have accrued a skill set that is extremely valuable to my fellow professionals. Eager to do whatever I can to help them, I have owned and operated Better Cementing for All since 2016.
Let me tell you what Better Cementing for All does and what it means. A resource for all oil industry professionals and for cementers both established and prospective, this is a non-profit resource that I established in order to do nothing but serve and make an impact on people who are looking to build careers for themselves in cementing.
From primary cementing to remedial cementing to plug cementing to post-job results, I do it all, and I am comfortable answering in-depth questions about each and every one of these topics. I also offer tools and tips for jobseekers, general self-development advice, and guidance for equipment choices. TO put it simply, this is the go-to spot for anyone who wants to know anything about oil well cementing.
The problem, however, is that covid-19 has made the structure of the website seem untenable. I am trying to juggle the work that I do and my non-profit initiatives and finding it all unhealthy and unsustainable. I want to keep Better Cementing for All up and running, but to do that, I need your help.


My NEW introductory VIDEO

Recent Posts

Max Out Your Cement Coverage

If we consider the main variables to ensure proper mud in hole replacement with cement: stand-off, … [Read More...] about Max Out Your Cement Coverage

Cementing Flowchart

In recent weeks, I received some reader requests to include cement job processes or procedures as … [Read More...] about Cementing Flowchart

Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones

This article will provide you with some actionable suggestions for cementing across permeable zones. … [Read More...] about Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones

Forensic Cementing

Forensic is a term usually associated with crimes. Criminal forensics is the use of science to … [Read More...] about Forensic Cementing

Cement Slurry design Basics

First, here is a handy table to simplify the process of cement slurry design: Additive … [Read More...] about Cement Slurry design Basics

well cementing pre-job cement challenge question

Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)

Though I am far from being an animation expert, during my training courses I have always wanted to … [Read More...] about Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)

Need urgent help?

WhatsApp me at this number: +34 657 07 01 78

Footer

Recent activity

Visit our latest posts and help others by adding a comment.

Make your contribution and help keep Better Cementing for All alive!

Now more than ever, we are facing a loss of expertise in our industry, and Better Cementing for All is a unifying force, featuring interactions among industry professionals, knowledge sharing through posts, and other valuable pieces of content that we need to preserve.

Recent Comments

  • Merit on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on All you need to know about Bentonite in Cement Slurries
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Suicide Squeeze Cementing: risky but valid
  • Samuel Bekele Bedjiga on All you need to know about Bentonite in Cement Slurries

Recent Posts

  • Max Out Your Cement Coverage
  • Cementing Flowchart
  • Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones
  • Forensic Cementing
  • Cement Slurry design Basics
  • Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)
  • Plug and Abandonment Webinar (Español)
  • Webinar series (II). Quality Assurance in Cementing Operations (Spanish)
  • Webinar series (I). Log interpretation (Spanish)

Submit your email

&middot Better Well Cementing For All is owned by L. Diaz © 2023 &middot TOS & Privacy Policy &middot Web Design &middot