• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Primary Cementing
  • Remedial Cementing
  • Plug Cementing
  • Job Execution
  • Post-job results interpretation
  • Equipment
  • Laboratory
  • Mission
  • About
  • Contact and Questions?
  • My Cementing Challenges

Better Well Cementing for ALL

The Leading Online Support Hub for Better Oil Well Cementing.

Mixing Energy or Shear Rate? The effect on Cement Slurry?

November 13, 2017 By Lenin Diaz Leave a Comment

Mixing Energy or Shear Rate? The effect on Cement Slurry?

Back in 2016, I posted an article on laboratory testing for cement slurries. In this article, I briefly referred to the changes in the preparation of the slurry in the laboratory, to account for the additional mixing energy typical in small slurry volume jobs using a batch-mixer. (Like in coiled tubing/CT operations).

A typical use for additional blending time

It is common in CT service companies to increase the time in the blender at 12,000 rpm. The purpose is to ‘simulate’ the additional mixing energy created, not only inside the batch-mixer but also through the CT when compared with the mixing energy derived from the standard API procedure. This knowledge has widely known for the last two decades.

Recently I found an article published in 1996, with some interesting conclusions about the effect of mixing energy on slurry properties. The article, in fact, concludes that mixing energy is not as important as shear rate.

Below are some relevant findings in this study:

  • At equal mixing energies, direct comparisons between the different devices (laboratory blender or field equipment) never led to matching results. In all cases, the differences among mixing devices were much more pronounced than the differences among various levels of mixing energy.
  • As the shear rate increases, the yield point declines dramatically at the lower shear rates and then tends to increase.
  • Shear rate is far more important than mixing energy in controlling slurry properties.

Here there is some good and bad news for CT engineers. The most important is that even if total mixing energy is higher when using the batch-mixer, the rate at which shear is applied is lower than lab equipment. This could lead to differences, the most important being rheology, a critical factor CT cementing.

Recent experience

Recently, I experienced the difference between laboratory and field equipment for a small cement slurry volume. In this case, the ‘standard’ additional mixing energy calculation was done and applied in the laboratory slurry preparation. All test protocols were followed for both the pilot testing and testing using field mix water. All slurry properties were in range for CT cementing and as intended.

However, during field mixing the slurry changed dramatically deviating from the expected behavior seen in the lab. Specifically, the slurry displayed high viscosity and gel strength development, which eventually caused the job to be aborted. Later during a yard test, again the slurry showed the similar behavior that was completely different from the performance in the laboratory.

An older personal example

Here is an older example, this one from my earlier days. The effect of mixing energy was investigated prior to a small volume cementing operation (cement squeeze) a using batch-mixer. We saw the following results.

In this case, we simulated the additional mixing energy with an extended time at 12,000 rpm. This caused an increase in Yield Point, Gel development, fluid loss and a decreased in thickening time. The cement slurry needed to be redesigned to counteract this effect and keep the properties in range to achieve the operational conditions and objectives.

As the article concludes:

“The cement mixing process is not completely understood. The various cement types and a large number of additives contribute significantly to the complexity”.

Reproducing mixing energy in the laboratory, using standard formulas, is definitely more practical and easy to implement. But, if the shear rate is more relevant to the final properties, the risk of experiencing unwanted cement slurry behavior in the field remains.

Please take a look at the article and share your opinion or experiences

Looking forward to your feedback

 

Cheers

L. Diaz

Related posts:

  1. Cement Slurry Laboratory Testing
  2. Cement Slurry Mix Design Decision Tree
  3. Preventing Cement Slurry Contamination
  4. Tie-back Casing Cementing

Filed Under: Laboratory, Remedial Cementing Tagged With: cement squeeze, CT, mixing energy, shear rate

Article Posted By:

Lenin Diaz is an oil industry specialist with 19 years of technical and operational expertise in fluids, cementing, water control and shut-off. A distinguished track record spanning BP, Schlumberger, and NAPESCO. Lenin lives in Tenerife, Spain and is the creator of this website. Read More…

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

My personal experience

How am I surviving this Downturn?

Find the content you need

Archives

24 Page Free Primary Cementing Guide

Click this image to take a look. It is comprehensive and easy to follow too!

My NEW introductory VIDEO

Recent Posts

Highly deviated or Horizontal well section abandonment?

I have to be honest, it is only recently that I had the opportunity to place frequent cement plugs … [Read More...] about Highly deviated or Horizontal well section abandonment?

Successful Well Cementing

The case of unawareness Vs. understanding What are the consequences of knowing the outcome of … [Read More...] about Successful Well Cementing

Well Cementing engineering advice article

In need of Cementing Engineering Training?

Recently, someone asked me about cementing engineering training schools by an employee of a regional … [Read More...] about In need of Cementing Engineering Training?

Forward thinking reverse cementing

I recently participated in a discussion about opting for the best alternative between conventional … [Read More...] about Forward thinking reverse cementing

Gas migration and surface casing vent flow (SCVF) issues and prevention

Please read and comment on the following fascinating article about SCVF problems written by my … [Read More...] about Gas migration and surface casing vent flow (SCVF) issues and prevention

aren't you tired meme, angry man

Mud Displacement, the ‘mystery’ factor in gas and fluids migration

Very often I find myself helping people having issues with fluids migrating following primary … [Read More...] about Mud Displacement, the ‘mystery’ factor in gas and fluids migration

Following the loss of my job few months ago after a 20 year long career, I started to post in LinkedIn, a series of 'Cementing Challenges' to keep ours minds 'active' around our beloved topic of well Cementing. This interaction with our community and their reaction to the 'challenges' was a fruitful learning experience, but to be honest it wasn’t enough to fill the space this downturn has left by keeping me away from the 'action'. This inspired me to go further not abandoning my passion in Cementing, but to dedicate a web site to well cementing and helping people.
.
This is what you see here, an opportunity for you and me to 'talk cementing'and help each other to get 'Better Well Cementing for ALL' ⇒ Free and accessible to those needing answers and technical support in Well Cementing
.
Hope it is useful to you and I appreciate from the bottom of my heart all your support
.
Best regards, L. Diaz
.

Ways to provide support:
.
1) If I invite you, help me providing the best possible answer to an user's request
.
2) Are you an expert in Cementing? Do you want to be a Contributor to make Posts ? Let me know
.
3) Making suggestions
.
4) Making a Donation
.

Need urgent help?

WhatsApp me at this number: +34 657 07 01 78

Footer

Recent activity

Visit our latest posts and help others by adding a comment. Stay in touch by joining our mailing list.

Our Mission

Establish an online resource free and accessible(*) to anybody looking for cementing support(**)
.
 (*) This site is free however it carries some cost. Better Well Cementing for ALL team appreciate your support with a monetary contribution - Please Donate
 (**)  All request will be private and confidential in nature. Only the submitting person can give me the authority to initiate Group Collaboration (invite selected individuals to assist me with a particular request) or blog-mode (Request will be posted and open to all site members to provide feedback).

Recent Comments

  • Lenin Diaz on Squeeze Cementing Principles
  • Lenin Diaz on Highly deviated or Horizontal well section abandonment?
  • Jeff Long on Highly deviated or Horizontal well section abandonment?
  • Mohammed Alkhamis on Squeeze Cementing Principles
  • Lenin Diaz on Highly deviated or Horizontal well section abandonment?
  • Paul Howlett on Highly deviated or Horizontal well section abandonment?
  • Lenin Diaz on Our Mission

Recent Posts

  • Highly deviated or Horizontal well section abandonment?
  • Successful Well Cementing
  • In need of Cementing Engineering Training?
  • Forward thinking reverse cementing
  • Gas migration and surface casing vent flow (SCVF) issues and prevention
  • Mud Displacement, the ‘mystery’ factor in gas and fluids migration
  • Mixing Energy or Shear Rate? The effect on Cement Slurry?
  • Self Purchase PPE for Oil Workers
  • As a cementer, you are required to isolate a possible influx zone at 1600m, What can you do?

Submit your email

&middot Better Well Cementing For All is owned by Bruselas Star, S.A.© 2019 &middot TOS & Privacy Policy &middot Web Design &middot