• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Primary Cementing
  • Remedial Cementing
  • Plug Cementing
  • Job Execution
  • Post-job results interpretation
  • Equipment
  • Laboratory
  • Mission
  • About
  • Contact and Questions?
  • My Cementing Challenges

Better Well Cementing for ALL

The Leading Online Support Hub for Better Oil Well Cementing.

Cement Slurry Contamination: Prevention

August 6, 2017 By Lenin Diaz 3 Comments

Cement Slurry Contamination: Prevention

This post provides additional information for those who need more detail regarding cement slurry contamination. This is a follow-up post to previous posts where we covered fluids intermixing (as in liner cementing and rheology in primary cementing).

What are the consequences of contamination?

Poor Cement Log Evaluation:

Cement log evaluations can show poor cement in Liner jobs (typically 7” or less) more commonly ranging from 3,000 to 4,500 meters in depth.

And/or:

Cement slurry volumes will range from 30 to 80 bbls using only top plug even after having successfully executed cement jobs.

Gelled Contaminated Residues on Top of the Liner Hanger:

Strong contamination due to in-pipe fingering and annular channelling of the cement slurry, spacer and mud. This can be affected by the type of mud, mud salinity, density, the sufficiency of the centralization and whether the mud/hole is conditioned or unconditioned). This can lead to potentially dangerous gelled fluids/residues being left on top of the liner.

You’ll find lots of useful reference information on this table below. You may want to save it and keep it as a kind of cheat-sheet for your engineering work or studies.

Effect

Type

Action Details

Expected Results

PreventiveMitigate
Annular

x

Optimized Centralization, based on: software simulation with detailed well (Survey, Caliper,…) Configuration; Fluids Definition (OBM, Spacer, Cement Slurry rheology) and ECD management (known or predicted formation pressure and FG).High.

x

Reduction of contamination between slurry, spacer and mud by proper rheology hierarchy (mud displacement efficiency) during the Job design.Medium to Low. It lowers as liner depth goes deeper.

x

Cement Slurry / Spacer / OBM compatibility Tests: Rheology (API), Thickening Time and SGSA (suggested contamination profile 50% Slurry + 25% OBM + 25% Spacer or based on mud displacement efficiency simulation). Actions to be taken based on results.Medium to Low. It could be difficult and time-consuming to obtain a balance between the slurry designed characteristics for its primary purpose (safe annular placement and successful zonal isolation) and the resulting modifications performed to overcome spacer/mud incompatibility. This incompatibility can be manifested in rheology, thickening time, static gel and/or CS development.

x

Laboratory UCA test to be performed according contamination profile (select educated-worst-case scenario as per computer simulation in mud displacement efficiency). Provide contaminated slurry characteristics (Acoustic Impedance, etc.) to logging company for Cement Log Evaluation.Medium to Low. It could be time consuming for the lab and it will only has an effect on a better understanding of the cement evaluation log.

x

Use of Saline Slurry for OBM salinity higher than 180,000 ppm (This could also be influenced by BHT and OBM density).High to Medium. Applicability is case-specific.
In Pipe

x

Reduction of contamination between slurry, spacer by proper rheology hierarchy (mud displacement efficiency) during the Job design.Medium to Low. It lowers as liner depth goes deeper.

x

Possibility of using a physical barrier (bottom plug).High. It requires adouble-plug liner Tool system. It can reduce total slurry contamination (total contamination being, in-pipe + annular fluid mixing) in as much as 60%, specially for casing liners deeper than 4,500 meters. It could increased associated job risk related to tool failure or float equipment plugging.

Hope that this post has been helpful to you. I run this site for free and your comments and feedback keep me going, so please let me know what you think!

Related posts:

  1. Cement, Spacer, all there. But where’s the wiper plug?
  2. Gas migration and surface casing vent flow (SCVF) issues and prevention
  3. Workover Cementing Techniques 2: Squeeze Cementing
  4. Liner Cementing Challenges and Solutions

Filed Under: Primary Cementing Tagged With: fluids contamination, intermixing, liner cementing

Article Posted By:

Lenin Diaz is an oil industry specialist with 26 years of technical and operational expertise in fluids, cementing, water control and shut-off. A distinguished track record spanning BP, Schlumberger, and NAPESCO. Lenin lives in Tenerife, Spain and is the creator of this website. Read More…

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Luis Lobo says

    August 20, 2017 at 10:13 pm

    BPM…rate its important too.

    Reply
  2. Bikouyi Lekombagni says

    April 17, 2018 at 12:27 pm

    Lenin,

    I was going through your posts and this one remembered me some very hard time with liner’s cement jobs and particularly this contamination risks inside the pipe issue. I just want to express here that sometimes even with large volume the risk of having a poor cement log exists, maybe it is worse depending on the Well configuration.

    I experienced some Liner Jobs in Mexico (Mezosoico that you know better than I do) where it was very difficult to have a good cement bond. This was the case of some long 11 7/8 in or 11 3/4 in or 9 7/8 in or 9 5/8 in liners where a huge volume is pumped. There is no need to talk about the well’s condition challenges such as lost circulation issues, MW = 1.9 – 2.0 g/cm3 or more, issues to centralize sometimes etc… So, I will focus on their configurations.

    These wells are not only deep (set at +/- 5500 – 6200 m) but also long (+/- 800 – 1000 m length) that it is hard to avoid fluids contamination while traveling inside the DP and casing. This is because of the change in ID from DP to the casing while the cement is traveling inside (in-pipe /casing fingering). Even with an excellent design (centralization, fluids hierarchy, all lab tests, cement placement optimization etc…), the risk of having contaminated cement reaching the annular remains very high, of course, no need to mention the risk of having a wet shoe due to the film of mud.

    We tried many times and pushed for the use the double plug system in vain due to the risks involved as you mentioned above (Deep liners, high MW etc…).

    This does not mean that we did not have good results at the end, we had our learning curve. Among a large number of the lessons learned probably one of the most important was the time required to run logs to evaluate the cement. We started running logs, such as the basic CBL VDL, after weeks or months (sometimes after the next section was drilled and cemented) due to the delay in contaminated cement CS development (As per contaminated cement UCA test results). Let just say that it is easy when you have a comprehensive client because logs are not good if you only trust the non-contaminated cement CS test results.

    Only a small contribution from my side because it is clear that there are so much to say about this interesting topic.

    Regards

    Reply
    • Lenin Diaz says

      April 18, 2018 at 6:44 am

      Thanks for your excellent contribution Bikouyi, indeed with up to 1000m liner length and 9 5/8″ to 11 7/8″ casing size in pipe contamination is expected to be a big challenge, but in your case also the annular contamination will have big role. In these cases, depending on the zonal isolation targets, the cementing design could be focused to get good cement bond towards the bottom 500m of casing, with the rest of the available space, top 500m of casing + overlap + top of LH serving as repositories for contaminated cement. However with such a heavy mud, the longer the length of targeted good cement bond towards the bottom the longer the length of contaminated cement of top of the LH. In addition, this contaminated mixture cement / mud on top of the liner hanger presenting the risk to develop high gel strength. In these cases, having a 4-arm caliper log is highly recommended.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Trango DEPM is a team of Oil&Gas professionals with broad experience in the O&G industry. Working on onshore and offshore projects around the world, including most vivid and challenging areas as Saudi Arabia, US Marcellus shale and North Sea, but also small on small projects, requiring individual approach, we are well equipped to help you plan, budget, implement and execute your drilling project successfully. We also cooperate with number of other professionals with experience in such areas as drilling, geology, geophysics, procurement or logistics. This allows us to fully run your project or just support you in desired areas of expertise, depends on you needs.

How I survived the 2016 Downturn and the current difficult times?

Find the content you need

Archives

24 Page Free Primary Cementing Guide

Click this image to take a look. It is comprehensive and easy to follow too!

In 2016, I launched Better Cementing for All. Now, I want to keep it alive.

For more than 26 years, I have worked in oil well cementing, offering my services to some of the largest oil corporations in the world and committing myself to excellence. I have mastered my role, and in doing so, I have accrued a skill set that is extremely valuable to my fellow professionals. Eager to do whatever I can to help them, I have owned and operated Better Cementing for All since 2016.
Let me tell you what Better Cementing for All does and what it means. A resource for all oil industry professionals and for cementers both established and prospective, this is a non-profit resource that I established in order to do nothing but serve and make an impact on people who are looking to build careers for themselves in cementing.
From primary cementing to remedial cementing to plug cementing to post-job results, I do it all, and I am comfortable answering in-depth questions about each and every one of these topics. I also offer tools and tips for jobseekers, general self-development advice, and guidance for equipment choices. TO put it simply, this is the go-to spot for anyone who wants to know anything about oil well cementing.
The problem, however, is that covid-19 has made the structure of the website seem untenable. I am trying to juggle the work that I do and my non-profit initiatives and finding it all unhealthy and unsustainable. I want to keep Better Cementing for All up and running, but to do that, I need your help.


My NEW introductory VIDEO

Recent Posts

Max Out Your Cement Coverage

If we consider the main variables to ensure proper mud in hole replacement with cement: stand-off, … [Read More...] about Max Out Your Cement Coverage

Cementing Flowchart

In recent weeks, I received some reader requests to include cement job processes or procedures as … [Read More...] about Cementing Flowchart

Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones

This article will provide you with some actionable suggestions for cementing across permeable zones. … [Read More...] about Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones

Forensic Cementing

Forensic is a term usually associated with crimes. Criminal forensics is the use of science to … [Read More...] about Forensic Cementing

Cement Slurry design Basics

First, here is a handy table to simplify the process of cement slurry design: Additive … [Read More...] about Cement Slurry design Basics

well cementing pre-job cement challenge question

Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)

Though I am far from being an animation expert, during my training courses I have always wanted to … [Read More...] about Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)

Need urgent help?

WhatsApp me at this number: +34 657 07 01 78

Footer

Recent activity

Visit our latest posts and help others by adding a comment.

Make your contribution and help keep Better Cementing for All alive!

Now more than ever, we are facing a loss of expertise in our industry, and Better Cementing for All is a unifying force, featuring interactions among industry professionals, knowledge sharing through posts, and other valuable pieces of content that we need to preserve.

Recent Comments

  • Merit on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on All you need to know about Bentonite in Cement Slurries
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Cementing Equipment from Serva SJS Limited
  • Lenin Diaz on Suicide Squeeze Cementing: risky but valid
  • Samuel Bekele Bedjiga on All you need to know about Bentonite in Cement Slurries

Recent Posts

  • Max Out Your Cement Coverage
  • Cementing Flowchart
  • Cementing. Challenges across permeable zones
  • Forensic Cementing
  • Cement Slurry design Basics
  • Remedial Cementing with Coiled Tubing (animation)
  • Plug and Abandonment Webinar (Español)
  • Webinar series (II). Quality Assurance in Cementing Operations (Spanish)
  • Webinar series (I). Log interpretation (Spanish)

Submit your email

&middot Better Well Cementing For All is owned by L. Diaz © 2023 &middot TOS & Privacy Policy &middot Web Design &middot